Conflict between Hindus and Muslims - Free Essays, …

The Nature of the conflict in WW1 - Ghost Writing Essays

Category: essays research papers; Title: Conflict between Hindus and Muslims

At the same time, it is necessary to remember that the success of the conflict mediation totally depends on the fact whether the practitioner is disinterested or not. To put it more precisely, a practitioner needs to be totally disinterested in the conflict because it is “the major condition of an effective mediation” (Hocker and Wilmot, 1985:148). Naturally, it is possible to argue that in some conflicts the opposing parties can come to agreement without the assistance of any mediator, including practitioner. However, in actuality, people often lack essential skills to solve conflicts, while practitioners possess these skills and knowledge. Nevertheless, in order to find some solution of the conflicting situation, a practitioner needs to be as objective as possible. Obviously, the objectivity and the absence of any personal or other interest in the conflict of a practitioner as a mediator is the major condition of the general success of the conflict mediation.

However, the resolution of conflicts is quite a complicated process. Often people “cannot resolve a conflict that exists between them without external assistance” (Veenema, 1994:32). In such situations, people need some mediation, i.e. the assistance of a professional who could resolve a conflict. In this respect, the assistance of practitioners as mediators in conflicts may be very helpful when no plausible solution to the conflict can be found. They can be quite effective mediators but only on the condition that they remain disinterested in the conflict. It should be pointed out that practitioners have a profound knowledge of the essence of conflicts and conflict situations as well as knowledge of human psychology that can help solve any conflict successfully. Consequently, they can apply their professional knowledge in the process of conflict resolution.

In fact, there are several reasons which make a practitioner effective mediator on the condition that he remains disinterested third party. Firstly, it should be said that one of the primary conditions of the “successful conflict mediation is the mutual trust of a mediator and both conflicting parties” (Hocker and Wilmot, 1985:158). In other words, each of the conflicting parties should totally believe to mediator and his/her desire to help. Naturally, in such a situation, the trust of the opposing parties should be based on the objectivity of a practitioner that means that a practitioner needs to be disinterested third party in order to maintain the trust of the conflicting parties in his/her objectivity. Otherwise, if one of the opposing parties suspects a practitioner that he/she has some interest in the conflict, the conflict mediation will surely fail because, in such a case, a practitioner will become not a mediator but just another party that will support its opponent in the conflict. In such a way, a mediator just becomes a supporter of one of the opposing parties in the conflict.

Essays On Conflict Resolution essays on conflict resolution Page 2 Conflict Resolution Essay

Conflict can benefit teams as it encourages the expression of new ideas which can Train staff to resolve conflicts in a professional manner without the intervention of Based in Ottawa, Canada, Chris Wolski started writing professionally for

Conflict Resolution essaysWhat is Conflict

Conflict can benefit teams as it encourages the expression of new ideas which can Train staff to resolve conflicts in a professional manner without the intervention of Based in Ottawa, Canada, Chris Wolski started writing professionally for

Family Conflict Resolution Essays

2. If the selected strategy is not successful, what is your alternate strategy? Provide your rationale for this selection. Your response should be at least 100 words.
Team building strategy would be the alternative strategy implemented by creating groups and handing them assignments that they are supposed to complete as a group. David and James would fall in the same group and with the assistance of an administrator be expected to work together and their progress monitored. This would allow them appreciate the need to work together for the good of the organization (Catlin, 2000). The assignment would create an opportunity for them to identify the strengths and weaknesses in each other that would make their coexistence in the work place better since they will know each other better. During the discussion, they will most probably start by highlighting their differences and stressing that they should not interfere with their work. This will lead into them work together and finally reducing the enmity between them. The environment provided by group work stresses on togetherness that cannot be achieved if enmity prevails between the group members.
3. What potential road blocks might be encountered in resolving the conflict? How would you address these? Your response should be at least 100 words.
The major barrier that may exist is likely to arise from the unwillingness of the employees to change their perceptions about each other. This is highly likely if their conflict is a result of hatred that they have towards people of certain traits. This will create a huge problem due to the stubbornness encountered when trying to eliminate an attitude developed over a long period. This becomes worse if the individuals are not willing to change. The solution would be to make James seek for forgiveness from David by convincing him that David will gladly forgive him because he understands that the actions of James were not intentional it is only that he was hurt by them. Forgiveness may not be very easy for James to seek from David but it has a way of healing the problem existing between the two. An apology from James may not create a friendship between them but it will definitely reduce the hard feelings they have for each other.

Traditionally, human life is accompanied by numerous conflicts that appear regularly in different situation. In actuality, the life of human society grows more and more complicated increasing the probability of conflicts considerably. As a result, numerous conflicts become more and more widely spread in life of practically all people. At the same time, often conflicts affect the personality of an individual dramatically, to the extent that he/she needs the help of a professional. In such a situation, the role of practitioners can hardly be underestimated since they can fulfill the function of a mediator between the conflicting parties due to his/her professional skills, abilities and knowledge. However, it is extremely important that a practitioner remained a disinterested party in the process of conflict resolution. Otherwise, all the efforts to smooth the conflicting situation will be in vain.

04/07/2011 · Free sample essay on Conflict for students

Essay on Israeli-Palestinian Conflict - Blog | Ultius

At the same time, it is necessary to remind that a practitioner should primarily take care about the interest of his/her clients, about their health and well-being. This, actually, does not mean that he/she has to support one of his/her clients in the conflict. In stark contrast, a practitioner should rather “fully explain to both opposing parties the essence of their conflict and represent it from an objective point of view” (Sorokin, 1987:211). In such a way, the opposing parties will be able to view the conflict objectively without referencing to their personal position but simply listening to the practitioner’s explanation and interpretation of the conflict. To put it more precisely, they will have a chance to view the conflict not from their own, highly subjective point of view but from the point of view of the mediator who should be objective and disinterested.

Conflict Theory Essays: Examples, Topics, Titles, & Outlines

At the same time, it is necessary to remember about the ethical aspect of this conflict resolution and mediation of practitioners. In this respect, it should be said that a mediator, especially practitioner, is supposed to be the objective party which reputation is perfect and unarguable. In such a situation, the support of one of the conflicting parties is ethically unacceptable because the successful mediation implies fair, just and trustful interaction of all participants of the process of the conflict mediation. In other words, both conflicting parties and a mediator should be absolutely fair and trustworthy. Otherwise, it is impossible to achieve any positive results in the process of the conflict mediation if at least one of the conflicting parties suspects a mediator in the unfairness or support of the opposing party. In such a way, the question of the necessity of a practitioner being the third disinterested party in the conflict is also an ethical question because the violation of this principle violates the basic ethical principles of the conflict mediation and undermines its effectiveness.