In the historical period, when technologically advanced humans encountered less advanced ones, there was cultural and genetic interchange, but in the end, the technologically advanced peoples . If any place on Earth could have been used as an illustration of the climate change hypothesis for the megafauna extinctions, ice age Europe would have been it. Ice sheets extended so far southward that Neanderthals lived in relatively few refugia, but I highly doubt that it caused their extinction. Neanderthals lived for at least 300,000 years and survived radical climate changes just fine. Human-agency skeptics have invoked unusually violent climate changes that coincidentally appeared when behaviorally advanced humans arrived around the world, but that seems to be grasping at straws. Again, there is nothing climatically unique about the past 60,000 years, , so invoking climate-change effects for humans and animals that weathered the ice age’s vagaries just fine seems to be a huge conjecture that may be politically motivated. Human-agency skeptics have crafted different kinds of climate explanations for each major extinction, such as drying in Australia, getting colder and dryer in Europe, or getting when most of the extinctions happened. At , climate was a proximate cause, not the ultimate one. The ultimate one was people virtually every time.
Furthermore, you could just encounter the original and conventional Australian Aborigines, who still continue to stay by the ancient means of life. The familiarity factor gives comfort and a feeling of control. After a holiday break you’re hopefully determined to create some adjustments to your existing habits.
Yet the scale of the current Australian Diaspora is unprecedented, drawing happy-go-lucky youngsters, the best and brightest graduates, high achievers and retirees seeking new challenges. Although researchers can only find a tenuous link between the political climate and emigration, undoubtedly many have left disappointed by the direction the country has taken since 1996. Big intercontinental moves need a push to amplify the pull.
I’m pretty sure that people hate Jews for no reason at all and that Jewish behavior has absolutely nothing to do with anti-Antisemitism. People are always criticizing Jews for creating Communism and promoting it in the countries where they have control of the political system, finance and the media.
The best thing to do is call them anti-Semitic and then use the media to destroy their reputation. Also, it’s important to keep producing new movies about the Holocaust and reminding everyone how evil White people are while inflaming racial hatred toward them by fabricating stories of racism in the news as well as producing movies like Django Unchained and Twelve years a slave which are producing good results as we are seeing a lot more black on White murders and violent attacks of innocent White people. It’s also beneficial to promote the idea that blacks are superior to White people in television ads and the movies. This will surely encourage more White women to interbreed with blacks. Of course the number one thing that will deliver Western nations to the cause is to promote mass immigration of non-Whites into all White societies.
While Jews haven’t been able to quite destroy free speech in America like they have in Europe, Canada and Australia, they can still use their control over the media to defame anyone who objects to their displacement through demographic genocide. Thanks Jews.
The End of Australia a Lucky Country Essay
When Europeans invaded Australia in the late 1700s, the aborigines they encountered were in a state of almost constant warfare. What seems to be the case is that the founder group of Australia lived in the easy meat days and they grew and spread across the continent in a few thousand years. Once the golden age based on easy meat ended, they reverted back to their territorial natures and formed 600 separate societies, with between 500 and 1,000 people in each one. They all had unremitting hatred for their neighbors, with whom they were in constant warfare. The aboriginal genetic diversity supports the idea that those societies did not interbreed with each other, but stayed insular. They were all patrilocal and violent.
Australia the lucky country multiculturalism essay
Earth had never before hosted anything like behaviorally modern humans. Nothing came close. They wielded fire and began using it for offensive purposes, to . They had sophisticated stone tools and weapons, they mastered language and could engage in group behaviors that no other land animal remotely accomplished. They probably had sophisticated projectile weapons, and if the , they may have also . One !Kung arrow can bring down a 200-kilogram antelope in less than a day. What kind of animal in the Western Hemisphere and Australia, that had never seen anything like a human before, and would have been the of the invaders, and the large ones all reproduced slowly, could have withstood that onslaught? None that I can think of. Neanderthals were ambush predators of megafauna that were wary of humans, and whatever projectile weapons they may have had, they would have been inferior to those that behaviorally modern humans left Africa with about 60-50 kya. Neanderthals still lived off of those animals, with suffered during hunts. That would have been nothing like what the invaders of the Western Hemisphere and Australia encountered. They could have walked right up to all of those animals with no conditioned fear of humans and stuck their spears into them, maybe not even needing to use projectile weapons, much less poisoned ones. That scenario has been called the , but it would not have seemed a rapid event to the invaders. It would have been a butcher shop’s version of the Garden of Eden. Farther than they could imagine, in every direction, were animals with no fear of humans that could be killed so easily that it may have literally become child’s play. One argument by human-agency skeptics is that continental animals were subject to predation and would have begun fleeing fast. That seems like a weak argument, and here is why.